SoContact
Source-based explanations of email authentication, professional outreach and contact data.
VP Sales · SaaS · France · 50-200 employees
Your next customers. Within reach.
50 free credits · No credit card
Analysis · Reviewed on
Google distinguishes requirements for all senders to personal Gmail accounts from additional requirements for bulk senders. SPF or DKIM is required for all; bulk senders need SPF, DKIM and DMARC, alongside other requirements. Authentication alone is not a delivery guarantee.
ReadAnalysis · Reviewed on
CNIL distinguishes professional outreach from consumer prospecting. In professional outreach, the purpose should relate to the recipient’s profession, with information and a simple way to object. This is not blanket permission for all channels or countries.
ReadAnalysis · Reviewed on
RFC 7489 describes DMARC alignment, policies and reporting. A policy addresses authentication failures; reputation, recipient complaints and message relevance remain distinct questions.
ReadPractical guide
Source-based explanations of email authentication, professional outreach and contact data. Gmail sender requirements: what to review; B2B email prospecting in France: relevance and objection; DMARC: authentication is not inbox placement
Before using this concept in a campaign, decide which question it actually answers. Identify the company, person, domain or message concerned; these are different objects and should not be merged into one unexplained score. Record the source of the information and the date you reviewed it. Separate a verified observation from an assumption about the recipient. Agree on the decision the team will make from the result, including what happens when a field is missing or two sources disagree. A label in a tool is useful only when its meaning is understood by the people who act on it.
Inventory sending domains and services, check actual messages and consult Google’s complete guidelines before changing a configuration.
Use the example as a small planning exercise, not as a customer case study or promised outcome. Start with a limited sample and check the context before changing a record or contacting someone. Write down what you know, what remains uncertain and who owns the next check. Compare the result with the original question rather than assuming that more fields always mean better information. If the result conflicts with a current company website, a recent professional role or an actual message header, investigate before scaling. Keep the relevant evidence together so another colleague can understand the decision without repeating the research.
For contact workflows, distinguish professional relevance, data quality and permission to use a channel. None automatically establishes the others. A guessed email is not a verified mailbox, and a direct mobile does not guarantee the intended person is available or willing to talk. Use only the information required for the task, avoid unnecessary sensitive details and preserve objections across the relevant outreach process. Review country and channel rules before applying a generic playbook. For technical workflows, inspect the actual sending services and message results rather than copying a DNS example into production without understanding the domain’s existing setup.
Create a repeatable review process with an owner, a clear input and a documented result. When data is uncertain, mark it as uncertain instead of silently replacing it with a plausible guess. When the audience is wrong, change targeting rather than increasing message volume. When a sending check fails, coordinate with the person managing the domain and test legitimate traffic before tightening a policy. Measure qualified conversations or reliable technical observations, not an unexplained aggregate number. This reference page explains a concept; it does not retrieve real contacts, send messages or certify legal compliance. Application links open the separate SoContact application.
Revisit the definition when your workflow, supplier or audience changes. Retain only the evidence needed to explain an active decision and follow the applicable retention and objection process. Consult the linked official material for technical or legal requirements, because a summary cannot cover every implementation or jurisdiction. Do not interpret a checklist as a guarantee of a reply, inbox delivery, purchase intent or revenue. The safest next step is a limited, observable action with a clear stopping condition and a person responsible for reviewing it. Discuss unresolved exceptions before turning a one-off experiment into a wider campaign.
Source-based explanations of email authentication, professional outreach and contact data. Gmail sender requirements: what to review; B2B email prospecting in France: relevance and objection; DMARC: authentication is not inbox placement
Inventory sending domains and services, check actual messages and consult Google’s complete guidelines before changing a configuration. Before using this concept in a campaign, decide which question it actually answers. Identify the company, person, domain or message concerned; these are different objects and should not be merged into one unexplained score.
Source-based explanations of email authentication, professional outreach and contact data. Gmail sender requirements: what to review; B2B email prospecting in France: relevance and objection; DMARC: authentication is not inbox placement Before using this concept in a campaign, decide which question it actually answers.
Inventory sending domains and services, check actual messages and consult Google’s complete guidelines before changing a configuration. Use the example as a small planning exercise, not as a customer case study or promised outcome. Start with a limited sample and check the context before changing a record or contacting someone.
For contact workflows, distinguish professional relevance, data quality and permission to use a channel. None automatically establishes the others. A guessed email is not a verified mailbox, and a direct mobile does not guarantee the intended person is available or willing to talk.
Revisit the definition when your workflow, supplier or audience changes. Retain only the evidence needed to explain an active decision and follow the applicable retention and objection process. Consult the linked official material for technical or legal requirements, because a summary cannot cover every implementation or jurisdiction.
Revisit the definition when your workflow, supplier or audience changes. Retain only the evidence needed to explain an active decision and follow the applicable retention and objection process. Consult the linked official material for technical or legal requirements, because a summary cannot cover every implementation or jurisdiction.
